Skip to content

Introduction

Why AI Native SDLC exists, what problem it solves, and when to adopt it in your repository.

For teams already using Cursor, Claude Code, or similar runtimes who need auditability across sessions — not another autocomplete layer.

After this page you can answer: what fails today, what changes after install, and whether your project matches the adoption profile.


Your agents are strong at coding. They are weak at finishing the SDLC loop:

  • context collapses across sessions — the next agent does not inherit operational state
  • process steps get skipped — QA, tickets, deploy proof are optional in chat
  • “done” is a language claim — no gate checks filesystem or board state before advance

That failure mode is structural. It is not fixed by a larger context window or a smarter model.


SymptomCost
Work lands on main without isolationreview noise, rollback risk
No evidence folderaudits and postmortems lack artifacts
Stale work trackerplanning diverges from repo reality
Cold next sessionre-explaining intent burns tokens and time

AI Native SDLC is infrastructure for long-running AI engineering workflows on top of your existing agent runtime.

It adds:

  • Deterministic workflow — stages, manifests, resume
  • Gates — PASS only when checks succeed
  • Memory + handoffs — durable state outside the chat
  • Observability — traces and evidence paths you can inspect

Install does not replace Git, CI, or Plane. It coordinates them around agent execution.

Terminal window
npx @jambu/ai-native-sdlc@latest install

Then in the agent:

/sdlc:init

  1. Show Me — one intent → tickets → worktrees → evidence → deploy (artifact counts)
  2. Home splash — same chain, without vs with, when to install
  3. How It Works — install commands and layer map
  4. Architecture — internal Procedural Cognitive Runtime Architecture (read after outcomes make sense)

  • Multi-session or multi-agent delivery (> ~1 week horizon)
  • Audit, compliance, or regulated environments
  • Teams on Cursor / Claude Code / OpenClaw with repo-bound work
  • Epics that need parallel worktrees and PR isolation
  • One-off scripts or weekend spikes
  • Throwaway prototypes under ~500 LOC
  • You only need inline completion — no SDLC loop

SectionPurpose
OVERVIEWOutcomes, install map, workflow vs runtime
ARCHITECTUREHarness decomposition (after Show Me)
BUILDPlaybooks, workflows, gates
OPERATELifecycle, materialization, distribution
REFERENCEADRs, glossary, risks

ScaleCommandOutcome
Macro/sdlc:goalRun manifest, waves, Plane hierarchy, deploy
Micro/implement-featureOne ticket, one worktree, one PR

Details: Lifecycle.


SourceOwns
PlaneWork items, sprint state
.sdlc/INDEX.mdScoped operational navigation
.sdlc/context/decisions/ADRs
.sdlc/sdlc.yamlRuntime configuration

Reference implementation: jambu-ai/ai-native-sdlc.